Resources Articles of Interests

Canadian tech firms need better entrepreneurial skills: study

Posted in Growth

Written by Derek Abma of the Financial Post on October 14, 2009

 

 

Too many Canadian technology firms are seeing an early demise because they lack the business skills to turn innovative ideas into marketplace success stories, according to a study released Wednesday.

 

The Impact Group, a Toronto-based business advisory firm, said in its paper that Canada is rich in terms of people who create great technology. What the country lacks, the study said, is the business know-how to turn fabulous inventions into money-making operations.

 

"While Canada is second to none in technology, there is a significant lack of commerce skills among our technology entrepreneurs," Douglas Barber, former CEO of Gennum Corp. and one of the study's authors, said in a statement. "Companies often find themselves dependent on U.S. and other foreign nationals for executive talent, especially for customer-facing experience and skills."

 

The Impact Group report was based on interviews with former CEOs and investors with 18 Canadian technology firms that no longer exist. Of these organizations, 10 became insolvent while the remainder disappeared through mergers or acquisitions -- five managed to do so profitably.

 

Much of the problem, the study's authors assert, stems from a general lack of entrepreneurial culture in Canada. The report's other author, Impact Group president Jeffrey Crelinsten, said in an interview that strides could be made by emphasizing the importance of commerce throughout the education system.

 

That can include a certain level of mandatory training in business by all post-secondary students, no matter what their major is, he said.

 

Mr. Crelinsten added that as early as kindergarten, children can learn about concepts such as "value exchange."

 

"There's a supplier and a customer," he explained. "It's not just a product or a service in exchange for money. . . . You have to understand your customer. You have to understand their needs. . . . Basically, you have to build trust. People won't deal with you if they don't trust you and think that you're trying to screw them."

 

One of the keys to a technology company's commercial success, the Impact Group's study said, is understanding that customers are the ultimate source of revenue. Financing from friends, family, venture capitalists and banks is not sustainable for the long term, it said.

 

"You would think that would be obvious," said Mr. Crelinsten. "But in fact -- especially in the technology sector -- we're so inebriated with technology, we think that if you have a good idea and enough financing, it's going to succeed."

 

Mr. Crelinsten said of the 18 companies that were part of the study, the average lifespan was seven years, and more than one-third never made a sale.

 

"And when we asked them, they had no idea who the customer might be," he said.

 

Besides changes to the education system, governments could help the situation by better focusing their assistance, Mr.Crelinsten said. He said Canada is among the best countries in the world at providing tax credits and supporting research and development. However, he said the country could do more in the way of direct financial support for promising tech firms and helping them move beyond the development stage into sales generating operations.

 

While the Impact Group's study focused on small, early-stage firms, Mr. Crelinsten said the failure of Canadian icon Nortel Networks Corp. provides a good example of what's wrong with much of Canada's tech sector, even the startups.

 

"Nortel was a research culture," Mr. Crelinsten said. "People weren't trained to be business-oriented or customer-oriented. . . . A lot of the people who came out of Nortel were like that, obviously, and when they started to do a startup, they failed because they didn't have the customer-facing skills."